By now all of you, or at least all of you who live in Hong Kong, have heard of Kong Qingdong, the Beijing professor who called Hong Kong people “dogs” and said that the Rule of Law is only needed in trash societies like Hong Kong and Singapore. Very indicative of how tempers have flared in the aftermath is this column in Asia Sentinel by Alice Poon – not so much for what she has to say as for the extreme racism and misogyny in the comments on her editorial.
So, my take? Who the fuck is Kong Qingdong and why should I give a shit about what he has to say? As near as I can figure it, he’s China’s answer to Rush Limbaugh – a big bag of gas who says whatever he thinks will land him media coverage, whether he believes it or not. I mean, come on, if Hong Kong is a trash society, what about a place that practices extreme censorship, puts people in jail without a trial for expressing their opinions, puts melamine in milk powder or builds schools out of cardboard in earthquake zones? Strike all that. How many people does China execute every year? China has the rule of law, too, it just doesn’t enforce it equally across all walks of life and classes of people. Kong says he’s a direct descendant of Confucius, by the way, 73rd generation. And what should that count for? I mean, after 73 generations, I think the bloodline might have thinned out a little bit.
The whole tempest in a teapot comes on the heels of the D&G photo mess, which presumably started because some rich mainlander didn’t like having his picture taken in their shop. It’s all a slap in the face to Hong Kong, which is now seriously dependent on mainland policies and mainlanders for much of its economic survival. Remember back in the 90′s? Damn, HKers loved to make jokes about mainlanders, how they dressed, how they acted, how they spoke. It was hard to say who was lower in HK eyes back then – mainlanders or white people.
So now the tables have turned. HK needs mainland money. HK needs mainlanders to come here and buy over-priced shitbox flats and LV bags and Rolex watches by the bushel to keep the economy going, never mind how that money managed to illegally cross the border. There is a divide – a cultural divide as well as a language one – between Hong Kong and the rest of China. Anything that attacks at that divide, that tears down the wall, gets people upset.
Am I being harsh here? Some will say yes, others will say not harsh enough. Maybe Hemlock or others will take it further. All I can say is this: who the fuck is Kong Qingdong and why does anyone care what he says?
Maybe the answer is that people are afraid that what he’s saying may not be true but that it represents, at least to some extent, the thoughts and feelings of the ruling class in China – otherwise why would he be allowed to say it and not be tossed in jail afterwards? And if that is indeed the case, what happens to Hong Kong?
Both sides are wrong. Both sides are right. What’s next?
Here are excerpts from some of the comments that Ms. Poon received: ”A coward old b!tch whining about mainland.” “her degenerate and prejudiced opinions” “Wannabee White’s like this Alice Poon are disappointed that she longer has the priviledge to asskiss the Brits.” “she is a neo-liberal hell-bent on trying to propagate the so-called western values like demoncracy, human rights, free speech etc. unto HK in particular & China in general That is alright if she balances her such admiration of the white man’s ideas with the darker sides of these same western bullshits which now prove so disastrous economically humanity-wise with equal zeal.” ”I think Alice Poon is whitewashed” “This Alice Poon like so many Hong Kongers are traitors.”
Pleasant stuff, eh wot? Maybe I’ll get some “you white piece of shit how dare you comment on China like that” kinds of things.





















