Nikon Doesn’t Make It Easy
Posted by SpikeMar 12
At the moment, I have the Nikon 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 lens. It’s a really nice lens. But it’s a DX lens, bought when I had the D300. It was really handy on my recent trips to Kyoto and Macau, being able to zoom out to 10mm, capturing entire buildings even though they were often on narrow streets where one couldn’t back up more than a few feet.
But now I have the D700 and if I wanted to keep using that lens, I’d have two choices. I can use the “DX crop” mode, which just uses the center of the image sensor and cuts down the number of effective megapixels recorded by half. Not so nice. If I turn off the DX crop mode, at 10mm I get this weird effect, a round image that leaves about 1/3rd of the area black and with a lot of color fringing around the edges. Zoom in to 15mm and the effect is almost gone. By 18mm the image does fill the frame, but what’s the point of a 10-24 zoom if you can only effectively use it from 18-24? So I’ll be selling off that and my other DX lenses as well. (Some have suggested that I should keep the DX lenses in case I ever decide to buy a second, back-up DSLR, such as the D90. I don’t think that’s likely to happen.)
If I’m looking for a different wide angle zoom, one for the FX sensor instead of the DX sensor, and if I want to stay with Nikon, there are two choices.
There’s the 14-24mm f/2.8 lens, which retails in Hong Kong for $15,750. This lens is said to be a classic, built like a tank and tack sharp.
And there’s the recently released 16-35mm f/4 lens, which retails in Hong Kong for $10,800. With this, one is obviously losing 1 F stop and 2mm at the wide end, where it can matter. But saving a pocketful of change.
On the other hand, the 16-35 has VR (vibration reduction) and if one is mostly shooting at night, this could be a very handy addition. But on the other hand, initial reviews of this lens say that it’s not at its best when one is zoomed out to 16mm.
So maybe it’s time to consider Tamron, Tokina, Sigma? Something else to investigate over the coming days or weeks. I’m now getting intrigued by the notion of making several day trips to Shenzhen and exploring and photographing different areas of our very interesting neighbor and I know that a wide angle zoom will be very useful for this.



11 comments
Comment by Geoff on March 13, 2010 at 8:29 am
Hi Spike,
if HKD$5k is considered ‘change’, then I would definitely suggest the 14-24 f/2.8. I’ve never regretted buying a good lens and I am still using a Nikon lens that I bought 19 years and it still takes great shots with my d700. Bodies will come and go, but a good lens will outlast the bodies and our own ever increasing requirements. I guess this argument will be void if Nikon ever come up with a zoom that goes down to f/1.4!!! but how likely is that (in the short-medium term) given even the f/2.8 are still struggling slightly when fully opened.
Not sure if you do portraits – if so, give the AFS 50mm f/1.4 a go – you won’t regret it!!
Oh, just to let you know… I’m a snob when it comes to lenses… I wouldn’t buy anything other than Nikon so feel free to ignore me!
Have fun,
Geoff.
PS I agree with you regarding the d90 or any other backup… you just wouldn’t go back to a cropped frame after the d700!
Comment by Spike on March 13, 2010 at 1:53 pm
“Change” was me attempting to be mildly funny. I’m pretty much Nikon-only on lenses, one reason being that they hold their value better for resale in the market here. I do have the Nikon 50 f/1.4. I also recently got the Nikon 105mm Micro Nikkor lens for macro work and I’m assuming it will also do nicely as a portrait lens.
My doubt on the wide angle zoom is do I want the extra f stop to f/2.8 or do I want the VR? Since I seem to be shooting a lot at night at high ISO, the VR might be more useful for me than the extra f stop. But the initial reviews I’ve read seem to indicate that the 14-24 is much sharper at its widest point than the 16-35 and in the end, that will probably be the deciding factor.
Comment by Geoff on March 13, 2010 at 3:18 pm
Given the quality of your other lenses, I think you would definitely miss f/2.8…. The reviews of the 14-24 is sooooo much better! It’s on my shopping list at the moment (that and the 70-200 VRII and another SB900…. the list goes on)…
Sounds like you are a fellow NAS sufferer…..
Comment by Spike on March 13, 2010 at 3:37 pm
I gotta say, I really appreciate how sharp the 24-70mm f/2.8 lens is. When viewing the full size RAW files and zooming in close onscreen, I’m thrilled with the sharpness and detail. The 70-200mm looks great but it’s so freaking huge. I think I’ll get more use from the wide angle than the telephoto, at least for the kinds of photos I’m currently shooting. And I’ve got the Nikon 70-300, not as sharp or as bright, but probably enough for my needs at the moment. The real test of this lens will come in two weeks when I’m at the HK Rugby 7s.
Comment by Geoff on March 13, 2010 at 10:06 pm
I have a very old 75-300 (bought it around ’92) and it’s still does a pretty good job on the d700. I used when I was at last year’s Singapore F1 and it delivered some decent results at ISO 1600.
IMHO, I reckon the 14-24 f/2.8 is the way to go…..
Comment by NK on March 14, 2010 at 7:31 am
Why a zoom? I use the 20mm f2.8 – light, wide, sharp and small. Solid build and considerably cheaper than its zoom counterparts.
Comment by Spike on March 14, 2010 at 11:09 am
I have a couple of prime lenses but my thinking tends towards zooms.
Comment by davethevet on March 14, 2010 at 1:25 pm
My travel kit is 17-35, a 50 and the 70-180 micro. I’ve not used 16-35vr but that range I find pretty useful. 17-35 is great close up, but mine needs f8 for landscapes. l’ve seen them used for 8k and at that price would be a pretty good buy. 14-24 is optically my favourite and l’d definitely try all three + see how they feel on your camera.
Comment by Spike on March 14, 2010 at 1:33 pm
Last trip to Macau, when I still had the D300, I brought the 24-70mm f/2.8 and the 10-24mm DX lens. I’m selling off all my DX lenses, as you’ve probably noticed, and that will give me most of the $$$ I need for the 14-24 f/2.8.
So then I’ll have the 105 f/2.8 micro nikkor, 50mm f/1.4, 70-300mm and the 24-70, so I think that should leave me pretty well sorted. I’m sure I’d love the 70-200mm f/2.8 VRII but I don’t see myself getting that any time soon.
Comment by davethevet on March 14, 2010 at 1:51 pm
Ps what about tokina 16-28? Might turn out quite good.
Comment by Spike on March 14, 2010 at 2:38 pm
For the moment at least I am steering clear of 3rd party lenses.