Hmmm …. I suppose most of you have noted that I have been getting back into blogging more personal stuff recently. Dipping a toe into the water, if you will. I woke up this morning with the idea that I would dip in yet another toe, but several things have caught my eye that give me reason for pause.
The first was a post by Mirebella, who wrote in part:
I have come to a decision that I will no longer be able to blog with the candid candor I have been able to – hiding behind a cloak of anonymity and all that. I might return under a different pseudonym but for now – I will be on the lie – low.
And this is not the only post along those lines that I have run across in recent weeks.
We like to think about the Internet as this vast expanse in which it is possible to bare our souls while at the same time remaining anonymous. But as I have come to realize, if you are writing a personal blog, it really takes a high level of talent to be able to do that successfully. Someone like Hemlock seems to be more the exception than the rule – I have often sat around with other HKers, bloggers and otherwise, and they’ll say “I think I know who he is” or “He has to be someone I know, but who?” No one I know has a clue who he is.
For me, while I have not used my real name or the real names of the people I associate with, I do use the names of real places and have given plenty of clues as to where I work. As there are precious few gweilos in my office, it would not take a great deal of mental power to identify me, if someone was so inclined.
While the blog had yet to create any problems for me in the “real” world, I came to realize that I have been lucky so far and that someday a problem could really occur. My lifestyle is not “normal” by most peoples’ definitions and what I write about could be highly offensive to some people whose moral code differs from mine. I had to think about what I receive in return for blogging and wonder if that was worth the risk.
What caught my eye this morning was two connected posts on two different blogs that illustrate the risks involved with opening up your life in such a public manner.
The first is this post on EastSouthWestNorth, in which Roland translates a Chinese article on a westerner blogging about his sexual experiences in Shanghai. The translated article starts out this way:
Today, with tremendous anger, I will tell you the story of an immoral foreigner and I call upon all Chinese compatriots to get together and kick this immoral foreigner out of China.
That’s powerful stuff. Further down within that article, the writer lists all the clues that the western blogger has used to possibly identify himself. Said writer may have used aliases for the women and the places he frequents but one fact remains – unless he is really thought this through, then he is clearly a teacher in Shanghai who has taught at several universities, so there is at least that one valid clue.
Chinabounder responds in this post. Most of the post is spent refuting individual points that the Chinese blogger has made and defending himself. He writes, “Listen to yourself, Zhang Jiehai, listen to yourself.”
He’s missing something critical. Now I don’t mean to be offensive but I realize what I’m about to write in this paragraph will offend people. So be it. In my experience, Chinese people, specifically people in the PRC who have lived their entire lives in China, do not think as we do. Their cultural backgrounds and the educational system in China have combined in a way that results in their drawing different conclusions to things than westerners, a different way of looking at things, different ways of rationalizing. Note that I am not saying that they are right or wrong, I am just saying this is how it is. And it is no different from some American growing up in some rural part of the U.S. ending up with some irrational fear or hatred of anything different from what he or she has experienced.
I can recall reading about more than a few instances of people in China rising up in mobs for what to outsiders may seem irrational reasons. Why are they bothered by this, we think, it’s so trivial – to us. By denying the validity of what to them is of critical importance we close the opportunity for any rational debate, building walls higher and stronger rather than knocking them down.
Don’t forget that China is so freaking huge that if just one tenth of one percent of the population gets pissed off over some perceived indignity (e.g. someone saying that Taiwan is independent, the Japanese PM visiting that shrine or a video someone has posted on YouTube of someone insulting someone on the street), well that’s still a million and a half pissed-off people. That’s not a number to sneeze at.
Roland notes that the Chinese blog post has been reproduced around the world. He further notes that he believes this backlash was inevitable because “the foreigner’s blog was obnoxious and clearly intended to arouse such a response.”
I’m not sure that Chinabounder did intend to get such a response but I do agree this was bound to happen. I think he thought that he was flying below the radar – in no small part because blogspot was blocked in China and local people had little interest in English blogs. But blogspot isn’t blocked in China anymore (at least temporarily) and I think it’s inevitable that at least some of the millions of Chinese studying English would take an interest in what the English language blogniverse is saying about them.
What neither Roland nor Chinabounder mention is the fact that Chinabounder’s “hobby” (if you will) probably does not differ from that of many other western teachers in China. So some who are innocent (at least in terms of publicizing what they do) may fall under suspicion as well.
If I was Chinabounder, I would think long and hard about what he receives in return for blogging and if that is indeed worth the risk. It would be one thing to endure such a risk if one was blogging about democracy, freedom of speech, human rights, activism and so on. But all he’s doing is blogging about how often he’s getting laid by how many women and how he’s so much better in bed than Chinese men. Is it really worth it?
Oh, the title of this post, which I think is clever, is a reference to Chinabounder once taking a woman to a restaurant called Le Garcon Chinois. The Chinese blogger refers to it as a Japanese restaurant when in fact it is a Spanish restaurant, despite the French name. And in some probably obscure and accidental way, it would seem to reference Chinabounder’s opinion of Chinese men – at least in their treatment of women.
Yes, it’s true. In China women can often seem undervalued. There are a million tales of female babies being abandoned because families wanted a son under the one child rule. Women are abused in many walks of life in China. But as a stereotype it’s only partially true as more and more Chinese women are becoming empowered. And it’s no different from other parts of the world, including the U.S., where some men treat some women horrifically.
So, back to me. I’d like to think I’m different from Chinabounder in at least some ways. After all, I’m in Hong Kong, not the PRC proper. I write about the women I’m with as human beings and when I write that some men behave badly towards them, I am writing about westerners as well as Asians. Of course, to some people that does not matter and no amount of rationalization from me would change their minds.
So while I am tempted to write about how I spent last evening (and this morning), I still cannot answer the question, “what do I receive in return for writing about this?” Or the question, “why am I writing about this?”
I’ll write about some other stuff later.